Sprayer Productivity Newsletter
The lowest cost way to improve sprayer productivity
is to reduce loading time.
What does sprayer productivity cost?
The size of a sprayer is usually a major factor when purchasing a new sprayer. The larger sprayers are more productive and a balance must be found between the sprayer investment and the amount of work to do. I found some interesting conclusions and some numbers that are a little shocking to me.
It is difficult to evaluate machinery costs and return on investment. I wanted to look at sprayer efficiency and find ways to evaluate the productivity of a sprayer. One of the first tools I found was a sprayer productivity calculator published by Tom Wolf and Jason Deveau of the Sprayers101.com website. Subscribe to their newsletter, it is a great resource. I have used this calculator to compare various sizes of sprayers and to evaluate the options as objectively as possible. The smaller sprayers did get a slightly higher turn speed in the calculations since they are lighter weight and usually more agile. The factors used in the calculations were ½ mile field length, two headlands, 15 gallons per acre, and 14mph spraying speed.
I also priced two brands of sprayers from our local dealers and averaged the prices together for the comparisons. The sprayers were equipped with the latest pulsing nozzle technology and auto-guidance systems. The smaller sprayers didn’t have quite as many features since some of the options were only available on the larger sprayers such as a stainless steel tank. Prices were collected for the 600, 800, 1000, and 1200 gallon sprayers. The 600 and 800-gallon sprayers had 90-foot booms, the 1000 gallon sprayers had 100-foot booms, and the 1200 gallon sprayers had 120-foot booms. The average price of each class of sprayer and the cost per acre/hour are listed in the following table. |
|
|
Several conclusions can be derived from this study:
-
Slower loading times increase the cost per acre/hour of productivity dramatically. The increased cost ranges from 26 to 42 percent higher.
-
Spending 10% more for a larger sprayer will increase productivity by about 8%.
-
Spending 7% more for an automated mixing system can increase productivity by 20% to 30%.
-
It is interesting that the smaller sprayers are more cost effective for their capacity. The manufacturers seem to give a better price advantage to the 600-gallon sprayers, notice the cost per acre/hour of productivity.
-
The price difference of 100 acres per hour of productivity is shocking when comparing a 1200 gallon sprayer loading in 15 minutes and an 800-gallon sprayer loading in 5 minutes. The price of the 1200 gallon sprayer is 32% higher and costs $93,000 more. The lowest cost way to improve productivity is to reduce loading time.
|
|
|
Mixmate Fusion
Mixmate Fusion combines the best features of Mixmate for automated mixing of bulk products and includes a specially designed inductor measuring by weight in one compact unit which is precalibrated. The inductor includes a high flow rate rinsing system for better handling of dry products and a valve manifold that automatically routes multiple bulk inputs with rinse water through a single flowmeter. Mixmate Fusion processes jugs in about 12 seconds and is easily expanded through CAN Bus connections. |
|
|
Mixmate Flow
The Mixmate Flow Stack is an automated chemical blending and recordkeeping system designed for bulk chemicals. The new software and electronics support a manifold of four valves to automatically route three bulk chemical inputs and rinse water through a single flowmeter. The flowmeter features a +/- 0.5% error rating and comes calibrated and no additional calibrations are needed in the field. Multiple stacks can be combined for additional inputs. A flowmeter and valve can be added to measure and control the water in the mix. The Mixmate Flow Stack is an excellent companion product for the Handler, Chemblade, or a basic inductor. The Mixmate Flow Stack can also be combined with the Mixmate Pro and Fusion Inductors at any time to give unmatched capabilities by any mixing system.
|
|
|
Previous Newsletters...